Faeries, Daemons & Lycans [Epilogue]

[GreenFlame]

I'm going to vote [Burn] No-one.
This is either the most obvious trap ever and we're walking right into it, or aA is a Patriotic Elf. I'm not one to blame if it's the former.

 

[jdthebud]

-snip

I updated Sopheria's vote tally, assuming her initial count was correct.

Spoiler:

gio7sm:
Klippy
apocalypseArisen
JohnnyMustang
Mana
Candy
Melody
Bidoof FTW
jdthebud
Seth Rollins
arachnidsGrip
eros
Fantome
Pecilia
wizardman11
Detox
no
Sonata
Superjolt
Netto Azure
Spectrum
Ullion
Christos

apocalypseArisen:
gimmepie
Delta
gio7sm
Sopheria

No one:
Deceptio
JaDe.X105
GatAttack
Arx
Nagi
Lost Heart
Cosmic

Currently at 23 for gio, 4 for Omi, 7 for no one.

If your vote has been tallied wrong here, speak up. At least 25 is needed for a successful burning.

By my count, there are 14 (out of 48 remaining) people who haven't made a Day 1 vote yet: Twiggy, Lycanthropy, Parivir, Lawlietta, Ninja Aiden, Charlie Brown, Nimsy, Kiyoshi the Polar Bear, Infinite, zevarius kerensky, Bacteriophage, Ash, Shak, and Jupiter. Italics are people who haven't even made a Day 1 post yet -_-.

- By the way Naku, I noticed something strange - Jupiter is apparently in the game list, but he never posted a signup???

 

[Seth Rollins]

mage probs did one of his tricks

anyway, it's really not safe to lynch gio. i think we all should just kill omi, if he's jinn, then hoo-ray if he isnt then we lynch gio next day

[burn] apocalypseArisen

 

[Salzorrah]

seth, you're missing the point

if we dont lynch gio, omi will die and will kill a lot of players, probably mostly havenites (assuming he tells the truth)

besides i doubt naku would like to end the game just like that on day one, considering this was hyped up from the start.

ALSO JD, it's 22 for gio, not 23. WE NEED 4 MORE VOTES TO KILL GIO, AND WE NEED TO KILL GIO.

 

[Winter]

But what if some of us want to see the haven coloured red? ._.

 

[Charlie Brown]

Burn gio7sm

Been reading through everything and I don't think it's worth the risk to kill Omi or NL. I really don't think we should NL because that gives the Incubus a chance to get a free kill.

 

[Etherion]

I have the Helfire Lamp.

gg.

 

[Strange]

I have the Helfire Lamp.

gg.

Why would you wait until now to say that? I suddenly don't believe you.

 

[Legendary Silke]

Sounds suspiciously convenient. If you were asking me, he's probably bluffing.

And now, for the vote of the day...

[BURN] gio7sm

 

[Charlie Brown]

I have the Helfire Lamp.

gg.

suuuuuure you do

 

[JaDe.X105]

Last-minute Hellfire Lamp reveal is pretty suss...

But unless Naku is changing the game so that 50% of votes are required for all lynches, what is different about this vote for gio that would constitute the 25 votes?? I'm still scared to follow the ambassador on this. If aA is right on this then I will (for the most part) blindly follow aG in the future.

 

[Charlie Brown]

But unless Naku is changing the game so that 50% of votes are required for all lynches, what is different about this vote for gio that would constitute the 25 votes??

It's a standard rule in this game 8)

In order for a player to be burned, they must have a majority of at least half the number of current players plus one.

 

[GreenFlame]

Totally not like gio might actually be working with aA to pull this plot, considering Jinn is a Daemon role.


I only see this as a very obvious plot by the Daemons:

>Jinn (apocalyspeArisen) gives someone who is probably another Daemon (gio7sm), the Hellfire Lamp.
>gio7sm goes along with it by defending himself in a subtly suspicious manner.
>Other Daemons (e.g possibly arachnidsGrip) join in the bandwagon against gio7sm to make it more convincing.
>Lilim has Jinn (apocalypseArisen) masked as an Innocent in case of failure.
>Easy instant D1 victory

How can we not see the very large possibility that this is a pre-meditated scheme?! It's ridiculous! Especially consdering that we know they have a method for instant victory by lynch, and yet we follow someone bandwagoning someone intensely D1.

[BURN] arachnidsGrip

 

[JaDe.X105]

It's a standard rule in this game 8)

Ahh. TY.

Who actually reads rules though????
Most other games here seem to have been whoever has highest vote count against them.

In that case, I'll follow aG, it's on you if we lose!
Burn gio

 

[Candy]

>Other Daemons (e.g possibly arachnidsGrip) join in the bandwagon against gio7sm to make it more convincing.

Wow.

 

[Lycanthropy]

While reading through this, I wasn't trusting aA at all, but Gio presenting his lamp so late is suspicious as hell. I'm scared to do this, but:
[BURN] gio7sm

 

[Parivir]

>Jinn (apocalyspeArisen) gives someone who is probably another Daemon (gio7sm), the Hellfire Lamp.
>gio7sm goes along with it by defending himself in a subtly suspicious manner.
>Other Daemons (e.g possibly arachnidsGrip) join in the bandwagon against gio7sm to make it more convincing.
>Lilim has Jinn (apocalypseArisen) masked as an Innocent in case of failure.
>Easy instant D1 victory

A successful lynch by the Jinn means a solo victory, so the other daemons would lose as well.

And I concur; the last-minute Hellfire Lamp reveal is suspicious as hell. At the risk of a D1 loss, I'll jump on the bandwagon here and choose to [BURN] gio7sm.

 

[Mana1]

Gio is Rumpelstiltskin, wait! ;)

Come on people. Not voting for Gio is effectively a no vote, if we don't hit 25 the Daemons DEFINITELY get a free kill. That is non negotiable.

Lmao with a slip up like that I guess we can say Cosmic isn't a Havenite too ;).

 

[esperance]

Still not sure what to think about Omi, but that whole lamp play seems even more suss, so:

[burn] gio7sm

I'm changing my vote. And Omi I swear, if you tricked us... :(

 

[Winter]

inb4 none of y'all are havenites