• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

8 Values

68
Posts
5
Years
  • Age 30
  • USA
  • Seen Nov 11, 2018
I took the test a year ago. It still holds up. I will just type the results.

Social Liberal:

Economic Axis: Social (67.7% Equality vs 32.3% Markets)

Diplomatic Axis: Balanced (41.5% Nation vs 58.5% World)

Civil Axis: Liberal (69.2% Liberty vs 30.8% Authority)

Societal Axis: Progressive (27.4% Tradition vs 72.6% Progress)
 
Last edited:
27,744
Posts
14
Years
g6fVTKG.png


I kinda disagree being labeled under socialism, but I guess my views on taxes and services to those who are in need are what set me there.
 
Last edited:

Mr. X

It's... kinda effective?
2,391
Posts
17
Years
FEjqE6U.png


Not as extreme as some, but it does follow the same general pattern. The results are mostly accurate, for what questions it asks anyway, though everything does vary by around 5% or so on retakes. Still, this is pretty much what I always get on this test.
 

Bidoof FTW

[cd=font-family:carter one; font-size:13pt; color:
3,547
Posts
10
Years
PaqF25E.png


Seems like most everyone here is getting social liberalism.
Honestly kinda surprised, thought I'd get a bit more centrist.
 
Last edited:
1,069
Posts
10
Years
8.PNG

I am mixed with almost everything to be honest. The economy goes both ways for what's good socially and for what people need as a whole.

Being peaceful is almost always the better option, but remaining neutral or indecisive towards clearly negative or harmful issues is bad too. Same for the other end of pushing those sort of negative actions.

As for being civil, I feel the same way. Just enough to get the point across but not too much or too little to where it becomes ineffective

And I am pretty progressive with most thing, but there's always an extreme to anything. Being "too progressive" is bad in the sense of allowing some very out there things to be considered normal, as some things are never normal in many social settings. But that doesn't mean not "normal" is bad. Acceptance helps, but there's a degree of how anything is perceived by the general people.
 

Ivysaur

Grass dinosaur extraordinaire
21,082
Posts
17
Years
hmm, i'm not sure i'd ever have considered myself libertarian - i'm all about a strong, central government. :thonk:

Having a strong, central government stay away from people's bedrooms and wombs and ensuring equal civil liberties for all is apparently libertarian in this world of ours.

Which apparently doesn't include collecting taxes and redistributing wealth, that's in another page.
 
Last edited:

Hands

I was saying Boo-urns
1,896
Posts
7
Years
  • Age 33
  • Seen Apr 25, 2024
yVKplIy.png


hmm, i'm not sure i'd ever have considered myself libertarian - i'm all about a strong, central government. :thonk:

I think it's just how 8values splits certain answers. I got it too and i'm very pro state
 

Resolve

I have it
1,081
Posts
5
Years
  • Age 23
  • Seen Apr 2, 2020
UGeBuWQ.png


no wonder i can't choose a side
 
Last edited:
37,467
Posts
16
Years
  • Age 34
  • Seen Apr 19, 2024
revolutionary ahah. cool.

this is me, basically what I thought I guess:

ayFtgin.png
 

Ice1

[img]http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-xy/icon/712.pn
3,447
Posts
9
Years
  • Seen Nov 23, 2023
https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=82.9&d=75.0&g=75.0&s=88.6

I cannot get the image to work, I guess.
82.9% Equality
75% world
75% liberal
88.6% Progress

Definitely not libertarian in any way. Way more of a socialist. What these tests often confuse is my personal belief in small nations. I have a fundamental distrust of systems but I also see how needed they are for things to function, so my personal compromise is on scale. I don't want a world government, and I definitely don't want as little government as possible. Because there is no system, every system is per definition broken. A small system is more easily amended.
 
Last edited:
9,630
Posts
7
Years
I just wanted to point out that the context which libertarianism looks like it is being used here is purely social. You could theoretically support a socialist economic system yet be characterized as having a libertarian worldview on social issues.

I have always interpretted libertarianism as fiscally-conservative and to the right of the Republican party in some ways with positions such as eliminating a federal minimum wage or replacing government assistance programs with local ones. Yet, they by in large support many progressive social issues such as marriage equality, a woman's right to choose, legalization of marijuana, secular government. From a social standpoint they overlap with the left-wing. The 2016 libertarian candidate Gary Johnson had a life rating by the ACLU that rivaled Hillary Clinton. I think it may be less confusing to some users to bear in mind the specific way in which the term is being used since this test deals with an economic, civil, societal and diplomatic context.
 
68
Posts
5
Years
  • Age 30
  • USA
  • Seen Nov 11, 2018
I just wanted to point out that the context which libertarianism looks like it is being used here is purely social. You could theoretically support a socialist economic system yet be characterized as having a libertarian worldview on social issues.

I have always interpretted libertarianism as fiscally-conservative and to the right of the Republican party in some ways with positions such as eliminating a federal minimum wage or replacing government assistance programs with local ones. Yet, they by in large support many progressive social issues such as marriage equality, a woman's right to choose, legalization of marijuana, secular government. From a social standpoint they overlap with the left-wing. The 2016 libertarian candidate Gary Johnson had a life rating by the ACLU that rivaled Hillary Clinton. I think it may be less confusing to some users to bear in mind the specific way in which the term is being used since this test deals with an economic, civil, societal and diplomatic context.

Honestly, it really depends. Generally speaking, Libertarians believe the free-market will do better than what the Government is currently doing. So even if they support social issues, they might believe that they shouldn't be a law imposing mariage quality, a woman's right to choose, legalization of marijuana, and a secular government (if they support any government at all).

The underlying problem with political quizs/tests, is that it assumes that because you support certain political policies, you agree with certain principals. For example, arguing that the minimum wage should increased, but assuming you must have more left-leaning views when in fact you are a Conservative arguing from a Conservative viewpoint.
 
Last edited:
9,630
Posts
7
Years
Honestly, it really depends. Generally speaking, Libertarians believe the free-market will do better than what the Government is currently doing. So even if they support social issues, they might believe that they shouldn't be a law imposing mariage quality, a woman's right to choose, legalization of marijuana, and a secular government (if they support any government at all).



The underlying problem with political quizs/tests, is that it assumes that because you support certain political policies, you agree with certain principals. For example, arguing that the minimum wage should increased, but assuming you must have more left-leaning views when in fact you are a Conservative arguing from a Conservative viewpoint.

Oh, I love a good conversation like this one!

Yes, I do think this is a very skewered test, and it is surprisingly general considering it asked 70 questions. Still, I also think the use of libertarianism/liberty as the opposite end of the civil axis from authoritarianism makes sense, at least as I understand the idealogy. The former is interested in civil liberties and individualism over the obedience to the state.

It would be conistent with libertarianism to say that the government should not have the authority to make a law banning any religions or literature or preventing people of the same sex or two different races from marrying, because it would intrude on their civil rights. Though yes, in turn they may not make a particular law imposing such a social position on a private enterprise or individual, the idea being this could also potentially compromise freedom of speech and individual rights. Libertarianism seeks to limit the government's control of your private life. Very true, this usually expands into the market also being free to operate with little influence from the government like taxes or tafifs, but the test I think is only concerned with the civil and social sense of libertarianism, not the economic implications.
 

Lycanthropy

[cd=font-family:Special Elite;font-size:16px;color
11,037
Posts
10
Years
I feel like this test has some questions that really push you in one direction by the way they're worded, so it's not all that fair as I like it to be.

Either way, I got this. Seems about right after all.
4CRzn4D.png
 

Neb

Cosmog Enthusiast
295
Posts
5
Years
I got "democratic socialism" (leaning towards the middle but slightly to the left). Since I've gotten the same results on other tests, I think this is pretty accurate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top