Pinkie-Dawn

i dont think there are very many of those people... they are mostly reserved to the deep depths of Tumblr

What is the purpose of the video? I can't watch it atm

Well at least you got a source on the issue.

As for Glaile, pretty sure whatever it had in the demo will be what it gets ingame when transferred. Probably the same for Ash Greninja to.

The Eshop still gets those errors everyone once in awhile. Repeatedly trying will usually work. If not you could always call the number and see what Nintendo says about it.

From what I found, Nintendo doesn't list the error on their site, but there may be two ways to fix it. You could keep trying and the game may eventually download, or contact Nintendo here:
https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/contact

This may be the best option as it could probably fix this the fastest. To get help, click purchases and downloads, then the 3ds family, and then click the what describes your issue toolbar and select can't download games. You can then setup for Nintendo to contact you and help you through the issue.

Hope you can get it fixed and download the demo!

Possibility. I could look for it then. I don't know answers right away, but may be able to find stuff about it online.

That's odd. I can't find anything else to possibly fix it, sorry. I'd contact Nintendo's Customer Service and see what they have to say about it.

If it's not loading, I'd say try deleting it once more and seeing if redownloading works. Are you on the latest update? I doubt it, but it may be part of the issue.

What's the error code? I haven't heard of any issues with the demo, but I'll try to help. What's it say for badge arcade as well?

And have you added anything to the SD card? That's the only way I can think of for a SD card to be messed up. So it shouldn't be a corrupted SD.

Thanks!

Cheers, Pinkie-Dawn!

This is the first time I've ever heard about him... watching his stuff now, I'll tell you about what I think later... I've been really busy with work lately and after the fiasco with my internet provider here in the office well... I haven't had a lot of time to decompress.

edit

Watched his Why most Anime is Sh*t... (to Me) video... he makes a fair argument... tho the reason he has such a bad perspective in anime is because of the stuff he's watched.

3 of the reasons why he doesn't like "Anime"
- People say weird and bizarre things
- The need of the tell the viewer everything that's happening
- Inner monologues

These three things are a clear sign of shows which are badly adapted from LN and Manga... so the reason why he doesn't like it is understandable... I wish he'd watch something like Gurenn Lagann or Neon genesis evangelion or Samurai Champloo...

WHY DID SIIVA HAVE TO DIE WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY








Oh well, at least we have TimmyTurnersGrandDad.

Where is your friend?

Sorry I gotta make this a tad short today.

I don't feel any pressure should be accepted on either side, but both sides should drop the censorship.

I don't see how complaining about how a Pokémon character looks younger equates to creeper tendencies... *shrug*

Insects are a vital part in the ecosystem, and you have more than a few thousand species living in your home at any one point. Even down to the teeny-tiny ones. Human pollination is a long and arduous process and termination genus' plants destroy natural nutrients in the soil and contaminate other plants, preventing them from reproducing. With Monsanto attempting to trademark and put forth copyright claims on a plant that's been around since ancient civilization is a bizarre way to go about things. Greed isn't a sustainable thing, mark my words.

I don't recall any articles of the sort- all I've seen for that kind of thing is simple speculation. There is this Hidaka interview which attributes the switch of Pokémon girls to a matter of switching up the "eye candy".

TL;DR Censorship is bad, Exo is wrong

Exodrake is wholeheartedly wrong. Human existence is not a sustainable thing. Animals do not adapt at how quick we are to destroy. Think of the governmental implications alone within the past 100 years. The Caspian tiger was exterminated by the Russians because they wanted the space. Avians are most likely to go extinct, mammals seem to be the second most vulnerable. In the past 500 years we've said goodbye to well over 1,000 animal species that we know of, and there may have been even more casualties along the way. It's accelerated to a point where human growth is beginning to far outgrow several animal species, specifically mammals.

Saying that it's the fault of the Great Plains Buffalo for not 'adapting' is callous. It isn't a bleeding heart thing, its a preservation issue. Insects, specifically honey bees, are beginning to become damaged as time goes on. We've seen hundreds of bee farms bite the dust within the last ten years. Insects themselves are vital to human survival.

Trust me, no one is ever going to forget how to make another human, yet we lack the capability of preserving a 'lesser' species. If we can't preserve what we have already, it spells a certain foreboding doom that won't be seen until, of course, it's too late.

They also don't take polychlorinated biphenyls as a factor either. Plastics don't break down fast enough, and at the molecular level, at all. Creating an item that doesn't break down into a foreign environment is... foolish.

////

On the articles of censorship: again, if you love digital or fake pornography fine. I can't consider these people as paedophiles simply because they have yet to harm any actual human being, however, once you cross that line it then becomes an issue. Real people are harmed through real photos. It makes it that more difficult to find the real villains when people are picking up cartoons and telling you they're criminals. How do you even slog through it when you're stopped and ordered to redirect your attention to yet another cartoon collecting crook.

My view of censorship comes in the form of "I have no idea what is going on, please explain to me" and receiving a big box of otherwise sanitized documents. Censoring games and film because they are violent (think of Australia's censoring laws) or pornography because 'urine/femcum' or small boobies. Jane Patten had this to say about Australia's 'small boobies ban'


Now, as fascinating as discussing pornography is I feel that I need to backpedal a bit and state that censorship due to perceived slights is a misuse of power (to prevent sounding like a perv). Censoring a movie or a game or a book for grotesque violence, despite it being wholly fictional, is doing a disservice to yourself. I recall Stephen King's book Rage being dropped from circulation because someone drew 'inspiration' from the book and went on a spree killing. Now, does a book spur someone to kill another human being? Of course not. The seeds of dissent were there already to begin with. What about videogames and movies? No correlation has been found between violence that is fictional and actual criminality.

People have been killing people since before recorded history. Censorship isn't just about pornography, it takes place in books and film. If someone then has the power to decide what you see, what you consume, what you experience then you're not doing so much thinking. Censorship is what enabled dictatorships and governments throughout history to come to prominence. Propaganda and censorship fall in the same vein and I don't particularly like either.

Now, does this mean that preventing a child from seeing someone's head stoved in is wrong? No, and neither is it wrong to prevent a kid from seeing something no one should have to see. Seeing real violence is mentally scarring and the smell never leaves you. Real death is a nightmare.

I'm going to try to answer your posts veeeery slowly and veeeeeeery calmly.

"Yet you're willing to believe every rumor related to Nintendo whose sources come from liars."

I'm trying to piece together what this sentence even means. The source of the rumour comes from a liar? I suppose you mean to say the source of the rumour is a liar. Of course you would back that up with a link - I should know better than to expect you to actual back up your beliefs yourself. And as usual, your link has absolutely nothing to do with this subject. Seriously, show me where Emily Rogers is mentioned in the Eurogamer article. I dare you. Do you even read the articles you link me to?

I believe the rumour will be right this time because it is being reported by Eurogamer, which has confirmed a lot of rumours in the past. This isn't Emily Rogers, pay attention.

It is not confirmed that the Switch will not replace the Wii U. Lack of backwards compatibility is not confirmation. The PS4 is not backwards compatible with the PS3. The GameCube isn't backwards compatible with the N64. How is this complicated? What kind of leap of logic is it to say that a lack of backwards compatibility implies a third pillar? Especially when Nintendo have specifically called it their next generation home console.

No idea why you think it will be an 'accident' that the Wii U is replaced. It wasn't an accident that the Gameboy is replaced by the DS - stop deluding yourself. The Gameboy was always intended to be phased out. Obviously they kept making games for as long as they system sold and they'll do the same with the Wii U, but they intended for it to end long BEFORE the DS, which is the main point here.

I didn't call the group a cult. I think a more accurate term would be echo chamber, but there you go.

Haven't had the chance to talk to your friend yet, but it seems I won't need to. You've seen it too, I know because you commented about it on Disquis. After your group's insulting dismissal and holier than thou attitude, it's all come full circle - the Wii U is most likely halting production very soon.

Those that would call me a mother****er, or claim that I am causing them to lose brain cells, for believing it can eat their humble pie. I'm not trying to rub it in, I'm trying to make a point. Your side has been consistently condescending and insulting, as if people who believe the Wii U is ending just want to see Nintendo fail. You have personally talked down to this forum on Disquis over this, as if we are some kind of monolith of ignorance. Now it looks like you're changing your mind and frankly, I think we have a right to find it absolutely hilarious. You complain on Disquis that now the "Wii U is dead" crowd is going to get a bit holier than thou. Honestly? Yes, we totally are, and considering how you were doing exactly the same thing before, we have a right to be.

Even if the Wii U gets more titles after the Switch's launch, the fact that they have no desire to produce more Wii U systems proves that they're ending it. It is now all but a categorical fact.

Here lies the most pointless PM thread I've ever been a part of, 2016-2016. RIP.

TL;DR: Real Lives > Digital Lives

As far as I can recall, the laws are iffy in terms of Hentai as a whole. Possession of snuff films will get you investigated and potentially incarcerated, but owning the film Saw won't. It's always been a slippery slope and I think that efforts are put elsewhere instead of protecting the rights of digital citizens. Sims have the right to build as much wood furniture and fireplaces as I please.

Exodrake sounds... not so smart. Evolution takes eons and is not perceivable in our time lines. Radiation, however, can be seen as a direct manipulation of the process though... Rhinos don't drive tanks and whales don't carry machine guns...

I'm not suggesting genocide, but merely sterilization and perhaps a limit on how many children can be introduced into the world. The more people there are, the more mouths to feed, less fish to go around, savvy?

I've never likes the Protect Law where it protects digital children and I railed on PeTA for protecting the rights of Pokémon and attacking Cooking Mama and Mario. It's much the case of Grand Theft Auto. Does going around in a digital car and mowing down fake or digitized citizens count as murder? The Protect Law doesn't word itself as well as it should and a 'depiction of a person' doesn't really clarify the process. It's a tool used to meet quotas. Instead of going after real criminals and protecting our living citizens (or deceased) we dump resources into finding non-violent offenders that look at cartoon pornos. I missed the class on how cartoons are real life characters.

Censorship and fruitless laws are criminal. If the case does go to trial where someone owns this digital cartoon pornography, they'll be labeled a sex offender for about 75 years and a felon for the rest of their life. The same as if you harmed a real child. See the problem I have with it? Digitized lives do not equate as real lives. Real people die and don't come back, and conversely some courts treat them like they don't come back [digital] and feel pain as if they were alive. The Protect Law, some of which was found unconstitutional by the by, was signed by Bush jr. It created loopholes that weren't there previously. It made it potentially possible to own legitimate pornographic photographs of real children so long as they serve 'an artistic purpose'.