Oops forgot to come back and update...
Current Progress: 2/20
Book #1: The 7 1/2 Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle by Stuart Turton
I read this on erik destler's recommendation. It was good! I thought the ending was a bit... out there? Unsatisfying, maybe? But I'm not really sure if it's because I was listening in audiobook format, which meant maybe not focusing as much on what I'd read rather than being in the moment. It worked really well as a format for the rest of the book, because it kept me in the moment in a way similar to the character as he suffered through time loop shenanigans, but I don't think it was a great format for picking up on the sort of minute details you'd expect from a Victorian murder mystery, so the ending just felt a bit out of nowhere even as they explained it. Oh well! Still good! I love time loop stuff and this was a great one. But I won't talk about any more details because murder mysteries are best left a mystery. ;)
Book #2: The Great Pretender: The Undercover Mission That Changed Our Understanding of Madness by Susannah Cahalan
I really liked this author's previous book, a rather personal account of her temporary psychosis brought on by brain inflammation. In her case, it was caught quickly enough that she fully recovered and got back to normal, but it made her appreciate how lucky and privileged she was to be in a position where it could be caught and that had her exploring how easily similar cases end up with people in the system forever because of mental health issues. This leads to her exploring the famous study of a psychologist and several others who went undercover at various mental health institutions in the US in the 60s with vague, fake symptoms—and all got admitted. Except you start to find out, as the author researches more and more, that it may have all been made up or heavily exaggerated, which is wild since so much of diagnosis, even today, was informed by that study. It was a very interesting read, but it did feel a little... personal and sensationalized? The writing style is the same as her previous book, but it worked there because it was a personal account. This continues as a personal account, but narrates us through meeting and talking with so many people close to the professor who did the original study, and it just feels a bit off. Still an interesting read, but I wished I was reading something more serious/academic on the matter.
My third book is Good Omens and I have to finish it before my library ebook expires in 5 days so hopefully I'll have another update then. (bc otherwise I have to put it on hold again and wait a few more weeks, rip.)