Maybe I'm not late to comment on this. At first, I really liked this, better than the official releases, being cleverly and carefully put together. I was going to provide input, as I really appreciate the author's displayed perfectionism, but it seems that this might be limited to the tools that it uses, such as the "PokeGame" shown in the introduction, once I looked up what it was. Thus, the author can't do whatever they want with this game, as they would be able with an original game, but rather, the author is probably limited to only being able to choose things like what any text string says or what any sprite is, while always leaving the base of the game unable to be changed. Most changes that would require something that isn't just replacing some text or some sprite, the author shouldn't be able to do them, which is why the game is left practically unchanged in those aspects in comparison to the original. With this in mind, it won't be useful to make suggestions for things that are out of scope. It would be pointless to suggest things that the tools used don't allow changing. Regarding what seems to be able to be changed, what stands out to me is that the linguistic level of the writing isn't too good, abundantly lacking punctuation and using an abbreviated speech best not used, besides sometimes giving an inappropriate style of speech to some of the characters (for example, the elderly don't speak like the youth). You would need all of the writing to be copy-edited, namely for proper punctuation. I could better explain these things, although with a lot of work. What bugged me is not knowing more precisely what's within reach to be changed and what isn't. I guess that I would still probably recommend this over an official release... :)