Tendoman77
Formerly known as "Da Man"
- 401
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- UK
- Seen yesterday
God, I hope you're right.
So it might not be the absolute end of Prism just yet after all, we can only hope.
God, I hope you're right.
Oh boy, the overreaction.
...
How you bring glitch hunters into this and call it a giant mess is beyond me.
Second argument he poses is Nintendo's take down actions are adversely against gaming news media and fans.
Problem with this argument is: ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Gaming news? We want to protect gaming news? The same people that killed the Dreamcast? The same people that have absolutely zero moral scruples slandering whatever game doesn't fit into their box, we want to protect them?! Sorry I don't swill piss. When gaming news media is actually worth a damned again, I'll defend it, but they've sold out lock stock and barrel and do more to harm the consumer than anyone with their slanderous finger wagging at the XBOne always online, but neglect to vocally real when Sony executive admitted PS4 could do the same, to spit in the Wii U's face yet praise the PS4 when they announced the Vita could be used as a controller, to not condemn Sony for not giving the Vita any real serious support efforts, for praising XBOX live long after consumers found out how little money it costs to use the superior server that people were paying a premium for and demanding Nintendo pay for the same treatment. One of the greatest things that'd come from the second great gaming crash will be those people will be gone and have to find new jobs. Because they certainly suck at the ones the have.
Also it's not against fans at all. Know what fans should probably do? Stop being so arrogant as to announce your fan game until it's finished and released you dingled berry brained morons. We should know by now that if they legally have to do something, they 9 out of 10 times will. And if they know about something, they legally have to act. We know that they are very protective of their IPs. So maybe, and I'm just spit balling here, maybe you shouldn't ANNOUNCE TO THE DAMNED WORLD THAT YOU'RE WORKING ON WHAT IS TECHNICALLY ILLEGAL! Jesus, like seriously what next? Rapists are gonna give their men/women victims a month's heads up before they do the deed? A car jacker is gonna leave a note on your windshield that they really like your car and are informing you that next Thursday they're going to abscond with your ride? If you're going to do something shady, do it shady and not in the light fools. I have no sympathy for them. None. And no gamer should because they make it harder for all of us to be normal fans. Nintendo has always been very grateful and appreciative to it's fans, maybe, if you're a real fan, you should understand that just cause they like you, doesn't mean they can't act when you tie their hands. And maybe, if you're a fan, you don't need money to show your fandom and you can respect it when they ask you please not to do something.
Next point he argues other companies blatantly rip off Nintendo's IPs and he doesn't get why Nintendo doesn't go after them. *sigh*
You know what happened during much during the "golden age of gaming"? Clones. Know why no one was sued? Because the games were different enough to legally get by. That's what these other companies do. Those other companies don't use the same DAMNED CODE OR SPRITES as Nintendo things, or blatantly copy large swaths of their worlds. Ripoff is a rip off, but guess what? They have different enough everything to legally get by. You want your tribute to get by then damn it can't you put in as much work as the ripoff artists? If I'm not suppose to care what happens to a company that doesn't listen to me, why should they care about a fan who doesn't listen to general business practices? That's only fair.
And now he's martying himself for "taking a stance against Nintendo's practices against fan games"
Then he deserved to be removed from the program. You're a bad ambassador if you can't see things from both sides. You're supposed to be their voice to the consumer and the consumer's voice to them. The fact that he did that without terminating his contract himself, and expected/hoped they'd keep him on, shows his sever hypocrasy in wanting to be able to say and do what he wanted, while ignoring Nintendo that same privalage. That sweet money he got from his views (I'm assuming he monetized his views) or those sweet freebies and exclusive releases, and the chance to meet legends, should just keep rolling in for him while he insult Nintendo and praise copiers. He sounds an awful lot like a machine that only loves Nintendo when they're doing what he wants, and that's giving him freebies and exclusive sexy products early.
I think this bears repeating: Nintendo doesn't care about the particulars of hacking techniques; they care about numbers. If you put your hacking stuff on a few forums and don't go advertising it in a youtube video that ends up getting over a million views, Nintendo isn't going to bother. They're not thinking "Hey, these guys reversed our code!" They're thinking "Hey, this guy's promoting his bootlegged version of our game to millions!" The only way the disassembly crowd would get a C&D would be if they pulled a Prism and gave it a flashy website, promoted it like a product instead of a coding exercise, and got glowing articles on every gaming/tech site on the web. Nintendo leaves the low-profile stuff alone because it's low profile, not because they don't know about it.Our disassemblies might be in jeopardy, because the content in them is unarguably Game Freak's and not a fan-work/fair-use sort of deal. Prism was built on PokeCrystal, a Crystal disassembly, and that is pretty well known if you're looking at Prism info, so Nintendo might be aware of them now. If our disassemblies go, glitch hunting will technically become more difficult. Likely, all of the people that rely on the disassemblies have them cloned on their own machines, but still.
So the game recently leaked. I wonder what this will mean for Koolboyman now that it's out there while this is still on his back...
A non-profit absolutely can take away from Nintendo's profits on their newer games.
The fact that Crystal is 17 years old is irrelevant. Prism was a new game set to be released in 2016.
Unless Nintendo are still selling Second Gen games to a sizable market this would not have touched their profits. I'll tell you who would of played it, Nintendo's long term fans who for years have supported them and their products almost without question even when they were absolutely awful (see: Wii). If you honestly think anyone was saying "Well I do want to buy Pokemon Moon but I won't now because of an amateur fan hack of Pokemon Crystal" then you have a very warped grasp on how the entertainment market works.
What if Nintendo decides to release GSC on the Virtual Console like they did with RBY? It's quite possible that they could see a hack of a 2nd gen game as potentially cannibalizing sales. The bottom line is that KBM should have released it sooner. He acknowledges this but wanted to make everything perfect.
God, I hope you're right.
FWIW, if anyone posts the link to Prism on this website they will receive an immediate infraction on the par of linking to ROMs.
Discussions are happening backstage, but that won't change anything. Prism was targeted because of the way it marketed itself with twitch and its trailer. That was going to get it taken down regardless of Patch/ROM/.exe distribution.So.. now that distributing Hacks through patches seems to be as illegal as sharing the ROMs themselves seeing this whole situation, what will happen from now on, sharing ROM Hacks in any way over here will be absolutely forbidden? How can this whole situation affect PokeCommunity and the fact that people like to distribute their ROM Hacks over here?