The Darkest Dungeon

I really have no idea who to go for so I'll just go for a random person who hasn't taken damage yet ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [molest with a pencil] Wizardman11

Please keep your pencil to yourself :/
I'm fine with taking a couple hits as long as the attacks are small, but keep in mind I'm villager role and don't have a lot of health.
I really don't know who to attack today, hopefully I'll figure it out soon.
 
Random vote? Okay then.
[RNGs] Golgari

sorry but I don't want to die
 
I don't trust "random" in Mafia
Too easy to manipulate
State your reasons or get out
 
I don't trust "random" in Mafia
Too easy to manipulate
State your reasons or get out
Indeed Zehn. Righto. Good point.
If gimmiepie has a large attack stat we need him to have health to survive the night phase, so we need to keep him at a high hp
[attack] mana
I think I will trust gimmiepie, but if he gives me just one reason not to I will attack him

At the same time, remember, if he didn't attack he would have lost half his hp, which no one wants. So I don't blame him for killing one of us too much.

So feel free to attack me back, to level the field if you want. I for one will not hold anything, and i don't want an all out war killing us both
 
It's only easy to manipulate if it's a random bandwagon.

These are attacks, not bandwagons.
 
Day 3 and no random banwagons yet! Hurrah. This voting/damage system is probably good for avoiding that tbh.
 
Could still be easy to manipulate.

"Random attack"
"Oh they werte hurt already? My bad, I wasn't paying too close attention?"
"Oh someone attacked you already this phase? Sorry, I only skimmed through all the pages"

Obviously everyone who hasn't given a good reason for their vote or has attacked someone already hurting is suss on it's own I guess. At the sametime, honest mistakes can happen too x:
 
I'm not saying that random is bad always, we clearly know you role. I'm just saying is something to be weary of
Also machomuu why did you quote some of my day one post. Just curious :)
 
He was pointing out how inconsistent you are, I believe.

edit: welp, ninja'd
 
Eh how is it inconsistent. I stated my reasons
 
You stated your reasons for not attacking gimmepie, not your reasons for attacking Mana.

Not that any of this matters, but it's just interesting that the only time in the game where you attacked and dealt damage was also the time when you randomly attacked someone. Kinda makes your bit about random attacks hard to get behind.
 
Could still be easy to manipulate.

"Random attack"
"Oh they werte hurt already? My bad, I wasn't paying too close attention?"
"Oh someone attacked you already this phase? Sorry, I only skimmed through all the pages"

Obviously everyone who hasn't given a good reason for their vote or has attacked someone already hurting is suss on it's own I guess. At the sametime, honest mistakes can happen too x:

> looks at what she said after bard corrected her

:( but ulli i am being honest

nah i totally get your point though.
 
I actually attacked mana for attack gimmiepie, I thought that was clear.
Whoops I guess :/
 
Wtf why is everybody becoming SMT Klippy you must be stopped
 
With all these random votes, a lot of people's attack powers should be confirmed once the phase ends. I think it would be a good idea if we kept an eye out for anyone whose damage is inconsistent with what they claimed.

That said,

[Attack]aeternum
 
damn, I'm so tired right now.

I'll go with my intuition and [attack] Bacteriophage/Chesire Cat

He's attacked Zehn yesterday, always been aggresive to people who claim roles and not very helpful otherwise...

At night I can choose any player and deal 1 HP damage
Also Zehn, would you answer my question of whether you used you're night action today and on who. If you've been sceptical, dealing one damage is not a lot, it's no problem if you hurt an innocent, but it can be very useful if you hurt an Evil, since you can tell us their user name/role. So please do use it on someone you think suspicious.
 
Back
Top