Baiting people by acting "scummy" is a legitimate strategy, it has been done many times and it's usually those who do not care that much of the outcome that fall in such baits, i.e TheCapsFan and jdthebud. Saying that it's outright scummy is in itself, scummy behavior. That's what I meant by discerning intention, which you seem to be lacking.
Your example of Mana is just you not being able to admit and making the same mistake again. In that example, it was only you who couldn't really tell Mana's alignment, so you're wrong here as well.
No fucking duh.
But jd seeing your behavior as scummy and basing a d1 vote off of it is perfectly valid. Believe it or not, not everyone can always tell why someone else is acting like an idiot. Unusual behavior is what you look for to determine mafia. That is literally the point of the game. So jd was correct in this instance. The "why" comes after, and that's exactly what it did in this situation.
I have to agree with Naku here.
Acting scummy (whether you want to put it in " " or not) leads to looking suspicious and eventually being voted. That's all there is to it.
When I said you made a good play, I meant it was good in terms of generating discussion, which is what day 1 is all about, not that it was good in terms of bringing results. Because that clearly didn't work out as we're still abstaining.
Nakuzami has been removed from the game effective immediately.
Is this legit? Do we get to know the alignment? If it's an inno, there's your n0 mafia kill. Do you still wanna abstain?