Offer an explanation (that amounts to more than literal nothing)? Involve thoughts on other players? Uhhh, I believe my original post covered both (albeit, I may likely be wrong with my guesswork on Bidoof assuming he is not a list role):
I do think you should re-read my post. My reasoning is to trust him for now, which is better to do earlier in a phase as opposed to later. It creates more discussion for myself and other innos to pull more information and reads from and as I stated earlier, gives players opportunities to defend themselves. As I said before, and I'll say it again - I'll readily change my vote. But not when the person being accused (yourself) is telling me that Zap is suss after the masses have mentioned on the previous day that he's just being himself. If other players not being accused by Zap (aka, anyone other than yourself) can convince me that listening to Zap at this point in time is a poor choice, I can (and will) take off my vote.
It's funny though, you're telling me I haven't offered anything up, when I have. I've offered up time, discussion and opinions. You say you don't need to offer anything up - which is weird because your main point in defending yourself contradicts what has been said on the previous day. If anything, that makes things look worse, not better. :/
edit: As poor as I think your attempt at defending yourself has been, I do agree on one thing: I'd really like Zap to post again and hopefully explain himself. If he doesn't admit to just goofing around, then I feel more obliged to believe he just doesn't want to out himself as cop but still considers you as maf (or cult). To be frank, I don't agree with how he goes about it, because if he is cop then he makes himself super obvious without even confirming it (so town themselves still have doubt, but mafia probably wouldn't) and if he isn't cop then he's literally just screwing with everyone and I hate it when that happens for no reason. >_<
