- 4,711
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Canada
- Seen May 2, 2025
Considering other options imo would involve thoughts on more people, and like maybe waiting for Zap to explain his vote before jumping on board. You still provide me with no reason why you are following him. Why should I be the one needing to explain myself? You're the one I believe needs to offer something up.
Offer an explanation (that amounts to more than literal nothing)? Involve thoughts on other players? Uhhh, I believe my original post covered both (albeit, I may likely be wrong with my guesswork on Bidoof assuming he is not a list role):
Kiyo had me confused with this too, I thought the night phase had shown that Bidoof visited someone. And then in a separate instance/occasion, Gunner was NK'd by mafia. As for Bidoof, to my understanding he has to be either:
a) Town power role (not loudmouth)
b) Water
c) Vanilla cake (with their ability to roleblock)
So he could be from any faction. If we get any more notifications at the start of a phase where someone else visits the loudmouth, then we will know for sure that Bidoof is not water. Additionally a question, do roleblocking actions (ie. Vanilla cake) stops a loudmouth from... loudmouthing? Also, I'm assuming Zap is softing cop? I don't see mafia trying to pull a move like this when they're playing a clean game (so far) and cult I'm not too sure. So I'll tentatively do [Lynch] Aquacorde and trust Zap on this. If anything happens, changes or people convince me this is dumb and I'm being played - I'll change my vote.
edit: Just re-checked the OP, I'd say Bidoof is equal chances of being Vanilla Cake, Water or Grape Multivitamin (assuming Zap is claiming chocolate cake). Assuming Zap is cop and lives this day phase, we can have him check Bidoof this night phase? What is everyone's thoughts on this? We can have Choc. Cake protect Zap so he lives this night as well?
I do think you should re-read my post. My reasoning is to trust him for now, which is better to do earlier in a phase as opposed to later. It creates more discussion for myself and other innos to pull more information and reads from and as I stated earlier, gives players opportunities to defend themselves. As I said before, and I'll say it again - I'll readily change my vote. But not when the person being accused (yourself) is telling me that Zap is suss after the masses have mentioned on the previous day that he's just being himself. If other players not being accused by Zap (aka, anyone other than yourself) can convince me that listening to Zap at this point in time is a poor choice, I can (and will) take off my vote.
It's funny though, you're telling me I haven't offered anything up, when I have. I've offered up time, discussion and opinions. You say you don't need to offer anything up - which is weird because your main point in defending yourself contradicts what has been said on the previous day. If anything, that makes things look worse, not better. :/
edit: As poor as I think your attempt at defending yourself has been, I do agree on one thing: I'd really like Zap to post again and hopefully explain himself. If he doesn't admit to just goofing around, then I feel more obliged to believe he just doesn't want to out himself as cop but still considers you as maf (or cult). To be frank, I don't agree with how he goes about it, because if he is cop then he makes himself super obvious without even confirming it (so town themselves still have doubt, but mafia probably wouldn't) and if he isn't cop then he's literally just screwing with everyone and I hate it when that happens for no reason. >_<