• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Our weekly protagonist poll is now up! Vote for your favorite Trading Card Game 2 protagonist in the poll by clicking here.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Battle for Gotham - Game Over!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, certainly an eventful day so far. I am thoroughly impressed by Weiss' doof .gifs, if that's batdoof then I hope he outlasts us all :')

Meanwhile, it would seem the only option to go with at present is

[kill] Nagi
 
I mean if Nimsy is lying then we'll find out soon enough. I doubt that she'd do this if her evidence wasn't certain or truthful.

Also I still don't trust Gimmepie at all.
 
...

You guys have a couple of mishaps... one or two roleclaims... and a huge bandwagon...

And it's Day, ****ing, one?

What the Hell is wrong with you people?

[PokeCommunity.com] Battle for Gotham - Game Over!

I mean, yes I suppose we can't assume Nimsy is THAT stupid that she'd make a claim like this without legitimately believing it. But regardless of that it was still a stupid play unless the entire god damned game hinges on killing Nagi. If Nagi is legitimately mafia then the mafia now know that Nimsy is in a position of power wherein she can obtain such information. Either this is a fluke of some kind due to another role... or Nimsy has an ability that can allow her to gain info about the mafia and their roles. (Or perhaps third parties.)

It's not hard to see how this instantly paints a massive target right between Nimsy's eyes... regardless of what protective roles we may have this really isn't a good idea on D1, at least leave it until tomorrow when we have more information in general surely.

Besides that well, I guess there's no other reason to disbelieve Nimsy. Even though it's very unqise to trust such a crazy reveal, especially when it has comparably little assistance to the cause in the long run. So...

[KILL] Nagi

[PokeCommunity.com] Battle for Gotham - Game Over!

I'm sorry Love, please don't hate me for this. I personally think it'd be a better idea to kill Gimme and have you converted, but I don't think these raving citizens with pitch forks and torches will have the common sense to listen to me at this point.

Still, I'll admit that shooting Nagi right now isn't a BAD idea. So I'll fall in on this lynch too...

Though as Syn said, I trust Gimme far less.

[PokeCommunity.com] Battle for Gotham - Game Over!

Edit: Also, just to mention, if Nimsy is wrong about this I'll personally lead her bandwagon straight to the farthest reaches of DC purgatory. In that case, I hope you enjoy your shared status with Quiltman.
 
Uh...being away for a few days makes things crazy. I'll catch up later. This is a filler vote and there seems to be a trend for it atm. May change this.

[KILL] Nagi
 
Not exactly sure what makes Pie so suspicious other than that one blunder. There's not enough evidence.
 
To be honest... the only evidence against nagi is literally one persons word and a bandwagon. Both have equal evidence against them, I just would have preferred to kill Pie and try to convert Nagi since Nimsy isn't often the most trustworthy information source.
 
Deceptio said:
To be honest... the only evidence against nagi is literally one persons word and a bandwagon. Both have equal evidence against them, I just would have preferred to kill Pie and try to convert Nagi since Nimsy isn't often the most trustworthy information source.
Click to expand...

Aren't they?... Nimsy seems pretty level to me. I doubt they'd risk the backlash.

Unless we have a jester role? Since there doesn't seem to be one listed I don't think there's much point fearing one. It's the kind of role GMs list to make people more cautious about lynching, after all.

I don't see how the evidence is equal anyway. Claimed knowledge vs "he may have slipped up"
 
I'm still willing to bet that GP is lying to cover his ass for that slip up. However, I guess I just believe that Nimsy wouldn't make such a risky play on day 1 more than that . . .

Then again, with how this day has been going so far I wouldn't be surprised . . .
 
Hey I was wondering why Nagi did't saying anything in her defence. Is this possible
Hush, the philosopher's student

Chooses a player to [HUSH] each night. That player cannot speak or vote in the following Day Phase. Evil will draw men together, even in silence.
Click to expand...

Is it possible that the person who have role of Hush , uses night action on her that's why she can't do anything during this day phase.
 
Mana said:
It's the kind of role GMs list to make people more cautious about lynching, after all.
Click to expand...

See, I could try and make you as cautious as possible, or I could not tell you anything exciting and watch as you figure it out recklessly

I think the choice is obvious
 
Golgari said:
I think the choice is obvious
Click to expand...

RecklessnessFTW.

I guess if the mafia really thing that Nimsy is a jester they'll try to kill her in the night for us :). Same situation as Naku's FDL - no GM is going to enjoy seeing someone win D2 heh.
 
Are you trying to get people killed Johnny?

ONE vote per day phase, you will not be allowed to change your vote after the first.
Click to expand...

Dunno if this means first vote or first day but I'm sure as hell not risking it.

Seems pretty sus to me. No such role is mentioned on the first post, let alone a lovers role that gains TWO lovers on N0, and we just happened to kill the only one that leads to a three way death.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top