"I wonder why Aqua never felt the need to invoke her pow-"
*recalls that there's a tailor*
"
she might've not even been that okay whatever"
God, this game.
So, do we know what our remaining roles actually do? I think working that out is going to be essential if we want to stay ahead.
Although this sounds like a better idea than it did on D1, since we're getting closer to roleclaim territory, I'll repeat what I said then: "I feel like it only gives scum a better handle on who're they're working against or what they should avoid, and lend credibility to a claim for an innocent counterpart PR (like Agent and Spy are counterparts with vaguely the same power, but differently aligned.) It also sounds like scum could make lists like these that are the seeds for later alibis." I'm not against it as much as I was, but the process sounds so
manipulable, especially for the roles you mentioned that have the super-ambiguous descriptions. But then again, I suppose now (at least visiting roles) have more proof towards how they affected the game, so maybe this is less of an issue? Jd makes an excellent argument about the cult, however.
I like how I said what my role did and everyone was just like nah doof
This lynch against Doof does
not rub me the right way. We are
multiple days into this game and there's pages of material to work with, so saying "let's no-lynch so we can get more clues!" sounds like a poor excuse so scum/cult can stall. If you want more content, badger those that aren't providing it -- the blatant ignoring of Pec's claim and self-vote make me believe he's genuine.
Can I ask
who'd be revealed if you were lynched?
A
[#LYNCH] hashtag vote in case time runs out on me.