No, absolutely not. I don't want to spend $60 on sprite games. It doesn't matter how "fancy" and "modern" they try to make them, sprites are an antiquated style that only existed because of hardware limitations. Pokemon had to evolve (pun not intended), and I am so glad it did. 3D games are so much more immersive to me than 2D games could ever be, and the 3D Pokemon are fantastic. They have a long way to go with animation, but the 3D models themselves are great.
I know that people are attached to sprites, and maybe I can't fault them for that, even though it makes no sense to me. I always pull up this comparison when discussing this: I can understand it musically - The harpsichord is my favorite keyboard instrument. Yet, it is objectively technically inferior to the piano. I just prefer the timbre of the harpsichord. I try to tell myself these two situations are equatable to help me understand, but I really can't understand. Video games are such a different medium to me in every way. I'm sorry... Perhaps hire some smaller company to work on sprite Pokemon games, charge $30 for them, let them not interfere with the production of the main modern series and that'd be okay, I guess. Mainline Pokemon HAD to evolve, it would have been so disappointing if it didn't.