- 26,064
- Posts
- 13
- Years
- Age 29
- Australia
- Seen today
Let's break apart these five points, shall we?
Answer: He was the reason why I was killed in the first game, which is why he feels guilty and wants to make amends for the last game. Furthermore, him and I have talked and both know that the other is innocent, which is why we've been protecting each other back and forth throughout this game.
Answer: Honestly, no idea why he said that, but he did confess to not being the detective. He probably just wanted you to get off his back - just like how you wanted to get people to get off your back by claiming you were the Vigilante, only that he had the balls to take back his assertion.
Answer: Duh, everyone in this game is trying to appear neutral. Everyone is reading between the lines of everyone's posts and looking for something to blindly follow. Neutral is really the only safe way to play this game.
Answer: This is the stupidest point yet. This is like saying a crystal tier user was Mafia then the other two must be mafia! Pointless claim here that has no factual evidence behind it, as this is a biased claim.
Answer: Oh yeah? Look at the first night when everyone killed off Archer99. He had no credible evidence that he was mafia, yet everyone joined the lynch bandwagon with that one because everyone wanted to stay neutral and not speak out against it (see what I did there?). Only one person supported my claim that Zehn was mafia and changed their blind vote - which I still have my suspicions about - and that would be GreenFlame.
Besides #2 - which is more stupid than anything - your points hold no validity and just sound like make believe hocus pocus in order to coo people to kill a specific user. Come back when you have actual evidence, eh?
What evidence have you got against Zehn? If you have something better than I do, I'll gladly change my vote. So far though, I'm the only one (bar Greenflame now) who has actually given a real reason for anything, it's not amazing evidence but it's a lot more than you have presented.
I'll tackle all your rebuttals in order of point for the sake of convenience.
1. You couldn't possibly know without a doubt that the other is innocent unless one of you is actually the detective, or unless you've been breaking the rules. I could believe that he's protecting you out of guilt, but honestly I think that Klippy is smarter than that. Your protecting each other is what makes you seem suspicious because their is currently no real reason obvious to us for you to do so.
2. He didn't confess to not being the detective, he slipped up and broke his lie. What benefit could saying he is the detective achieve if he is innocent anyway? As for why I haven't retracted my own statement, that's because it is actually true. Which you will all undoubtably find out very soon because I'm either going to get lynched or killed.
3. I'm not trying to be neutral, I'm trying to root out Greens and lynch them. It's an aggressive and risky way to play, but so far I've got one so I'm not complaining. When none of your posts actually contain any substance whatsoever (besides trying to prove your own innocence), it just makes you look guilty.
4. Ordinarily, I wouldn't even consider that someone would make the game that easy. But the way you and Klippy protect each other and apocalypseArisen's guilt do make me wonder. On its own this point would hold no merit, it is your actions and Klippy's that made me suspicious after discovering apocalypse's guilt. Do I think it is likely all three of you are mafia, no. However none of you have done anything that discredits the idea. Like I said, it is your actions that make it look this way.
5. Exactly, and how did the neutrality work out for us? How did random killing without actually having a reason work out for us? We ended up killing an innocent. Despite this, Klippy is still prepared to do that making his lack of concern for the Supporter side obvious.
God these heated mafia debates are fun.
Edit: Also I just want to point out that if I was a mafia there'd be no reason for me to try and kill a specific user when he's already made it clear he isn't really the detective. It'd be much more effective to just follow along with everyone else and kill whoever you were voting for so long as they were innocent.
to be honest gimmiepie, even if you aren't mafia you're being extremely problematic right now.
I don't see how I'm really causing any problems, certainly this is better than just blind lynching again. I'm giving evidence to support my belief, whether you agree or not is up to you.
Last edited: