The Darkest Dungeon

GP is obviously bullshitting, it's a Klippy game what do you mean you're a third party with a win condition? What third party in a game run by Klippy has a win-con? exactly. Klippy uses third party purely for shenanigans to screw around and make the game as chaotic as possible.... and it's beautiful :')

I'm also extremely jealous of such a high ATK stat so for now you'll fear the wrath of my DEATH POKE

[ATTACK] Gimmiepie
 
[attack] gimmepie

SLAY THE GIANT
 
holy crap that was a lot of stuff to catch up on.

anyways [kill] gimmepie agreeing with the whole power deal.

Hold on a darn moment. Okay I reviewed the thread I was seriously confused. I did not see your sign up anywhere, and you weren't in the OP player list either. I was so confused -> but you're the last name mentioned on the start of the day 1 player list. You gave me a panic attack xD;

So I support the whole "lets hurt gp!" thing. But I want to attack someone else, because I really doubt my damage would be lethal on anyone. And it might help me know the role of at least one person (since I'm the only person who knows how much damage I do~).

However, if you guys want me to help aim down gp today I can do so as well. You guys lemme know x.x
 
But I want to attack someone else, because I really doubt my damage would be lethal on anyone. And it might help me know the role of at least one person (since I'm the only person who knows how much damage I do~).

However, if you guys want me to help aim down gp today I can do so as well. You guys lemme know x.x
Maybe, but a good number of people have attacked him.

Not really advocating for it, since I think a weak Gimme is more useful than a dead or High HP one, but it won't be wasted. Certainly not today, it won't.
 
lol, then who do we go for?? no one.

Not only is that not what I said, in the same post I specifically said that nling would be a terrible idea. Try again.

explain who have you got in mind please.

Pie claims a third-party role with insane stats (Giant?), unfortunately making himself such an easy target that I have no doubt the scum have or are planning to throw some attacks against him. While it makes sense to pile votes against him and test his claim, we don't know how much damage we're doing, so I can only see this going in a few ways:

1) We kill him accidentally and lose an extremely powerful ally.
2) We don't do enough damage to kill him, but the terrors do.
or 3) We don't kill him, but after the bandwagon against him, he betrays town and kills PRs.

I don't see this playing out as everyone expects it to, and I think, much like in FDL, we're not handling the concept of an extreme power role properly. As such I think I'll stay off this wagon and reserve my vote for people who are actually acting scummy. Like you, or the following individuals:

everyone attacks the person after them on the player list, everyone's down by 1 HP if we all vote

Here it seems like you're not paying the slightest bit of attention by not understanding everyone has different attack values, yet somehow a few pages later, you've figured out who the Giant is. Dumbtelling?

We don't need an instakilling beast who "hasn't decided who he wants to win with yet" running around like that.

If you'd bothered to read his post, he specifically said he wanted to townside. Your reason is invalid.

And then there's this:

Spreading out damage is actually a decent idea this early in the game.

Also, if he's telling the truth and it's unlikely that he'll be killed for a few days even if everyone attacks him . . . well, hell, it makes more sense to attack him now, doesn't it?

So you seem to be advocating for spread votes and an outright bandwagon against Pie in the same post? I'm confused.

For now though, Arsonist, you are my strongest scum read as you became very defensive after I made a fairly simple, common sense suggestion. I have no problem casting my vote against you.

[Attack] Arsonist
 
/pant pant

Okay.

On one hand, I agree with the arguments that gimmiepie having a third party win condition is dangerous. I fully believe he'd keep his word about helping the innocents if we were to be particularly effective at wiping out scum early though, but at an end game with a nearly balanced sides, he may be lethal; considering everyone would be attacking him to eliminate the biggest threat and letting scum time to finish off people.

I don't think gimmie is going to be touched by scum tonight if he retains enough health. Even when benign, he's a great scapegoat by pointing him at the wrong people during the day phase.

[Attack] gimmiepie

He's just way too much of a risk and liability.​
 
(since I'm the only person who knows how much damage I do~).

?

So you seem to be advocating for spread votes and an outright bandwagon against Pie in the same post? I'm confused.

Yes and no, though you seem to have completely misunderstood.

Many people had been saying that it wouldn't be a good idea for us to spread out damage early game and were, quite frankly, supporting it with some pretty terrible logic. I was merely addressing that fact. I'm saying that it's not a bad strategy for this early game; but at the same time, I feel like going for gimmepie is the better of the two options at this point. Basically, if we didn't have a confirmed third party, rather op role to target, spreading out damage across several players would most likely be the best course of action.

If you hadn't noticed, in mafia many people tend to act like sheep that need to be herded. In basically any mafia game I'm in that I'm not GMing, I present various lines of thought and strategies that are generally found throughout mafia, and in games like this, I tailor them to the specific theme. I've always done this, whether I'm scum or innocent, and likely always will. I've even gone so far as to basically state the mafia's plans when I am mafia, especially in earlier games like Supporters Season 2 when mafia was pretty new to PC and many people were still learning how to play.

Trust me, I know what I'm doing lol
 

I was just meaning if I hit a random attack, and several other people hit other random targets. Then there will (likely) be those few targets at the end of the day with damage taken - each with different values. Since no one here knows how much damage I do (other than myself), I'll know what role I hit? Same goes with the other people random-hitting.

This would only work if several others hit other targets to. And that each of those targets would only be hit once. If I hit an inno, I can keep it to myself to try and keep their identity sage - or if it;s mafia I can say so and we can BW that person.

Of course this plan has holes in it. But I feel like we can do both this plan and get a semi-BW on gp at the sametime.
 
So can we just clear something up here, you really can't use me voting against Fox as an argument for killing me off.

1. He voted for me first, it was an OMGUS play.
2. We always vote for each other. We vote for each other and often seriously try to kill each other even if we're on the same team. It's fun.


Next, can we stop treating confirmed third party the same as MAFIA SCUM. I revealed to you in good faith, although admittedly I'm getting revealed at the end of this phase anyway.

I want to win with the town. If you want a few people to whittle down my HP then fine, but don't overdo it or there's going to be a lot less I can do for you. Pay attention to the people who are really desperate to get rid of me because chances are they're mafia who have paid attention to me saying I want to townside.
 
Klippy can i use my fake day action to slay these fools

Also, using the "Anyone wanting to get rid of me is probably mafia since I said I wanted to be townsided" is a huuuge reach. You are a loose cannon role that can do whatever the fuck he wants with the person on the receiving end able to do little to nothing about you attacking them. So any inno that has a power role could just be instakilled by revealing with you alive, if you chose to swing that way. However you could also do something similar if a cop-style role reveals a baddie and you instakill them. You're a threat to pretty much everyone that has something important behind them. It's mafia, just because you say you want to be townside right now doesn't mean you will always want to be.

I'm not saying you're evil and we should destroy you right now, I'm just pointing out how you're a threat to pretty much everyone and shouldn't get too offended by this lynch. I understand that you are willingly revealing yourself, but if you didn't reveal yourself like that there would probably be more votes on you than there are now.

You'll be most useful at half hp depending on how high your hp is, something where the innos can eliminate you if need be but you also have a large presence in the game.

Another thing, why will you be revealed at the campfire tonight?

Mafia scum :P
 
Last edited:

Well I can't argue with your reasoning, but I really do want a town sided win xD
As for how high my health is, well over a hundred.

I don't know if I'm revealed around the campfire or just at the days conclusion. Either way though I get revealed because I attacked. So my choices were stay unrevealed and lose 50% of my health or reveal and hopefully not lose quite as much.
 
Well I can't argue with your reasoning, but I really do want a town sided win xD
As for how high my health is, well over a hundred.

I don't know if I'm revealed around the campfire or just at the days conclusion. Either way though I get revealed because I attacked. So my choices were stay unrevealed and lose 50% of my health or reveal and hopefully not lose quite as much.

First of all,
[PokeCommunity.com] The Darkest Dungeon


Second of all,
I can't argue with that logic, and you got to kill Fox! ;D
 
If you'd bothered to read his post, he specifically said he wanted to townside. Your reason is invalid.

Umm... did you skim over this post of mine?

Survivor-esque roles are rather common in mafia games. All they need to do is survive 'til the end of the game in order to win. However, most of them tend to cross over to the dark side if it seems like they are winning.

I've seen more than enough games with survivor roles in it to know that most of them tend to side with the mafia if the circumstances comes to that. I mean, they're the winning side. Why would you bother siding with the losing one?

Sure Survivors tend to side with the villagers during the beginning, but it can go both ways as the game goes on. If the innocents (Heroes and Villagers in this case) managed weed out the bad guys efficiently, then yes, the survivor-esque role will be willing to side with them. But if they're not? Hello dark side, you'll give me survival 'til the finish and I'll give you my voting/killing power.
 
[PokeCommunity.com] The Darkest Dungeon
A carriage approaches from the Old Road. New travelers are arriving...

If you are currently a Villager, PM me with two of the following numbers:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
You have until the end of this Dungeon (Day) phase.

Good luck.​
 
At the moment myself, JD, Seth, Naku and gimme are going to be revealed. Oh joy. I guess evildoers won't know who is who though at least.

Hands/Arms dude (whatever that role is called D:) protect any innocents that show up hurt during the phase change!
 
Back
Top