Signature Rules & Check Thread

Tsutarja said:

It appears for me. Are you sure it just wasn't a hiccup on whomever's server the image is hotlinked from?

Click to expand...

Seems like you're right. I replaced the link. Thanks :)

Tsutarja said:

It appears for me. Are you sure it just wasn't a hiccup on whomever's server the image is hotlinked from?

EDIT: disappeared again

What I suggest you do is take the images and reupload them to imgur or any other image-hosting site so that they don't go down whenever the server its hosted on goes down.

Click to expand...

Can you see it now?

Just changed my sig again is it within the limits? I already resized twice but wanna make sure :)

All is good, my friend. Everything is within the limits <3

I'm here to check if my sig is alright just in case.

Looks like it's within limits to me.

CSS width% is not allowed.
In addition to the above, and to simplify CSS for everyone -- sorry CSS-wizzes -- CSS width in percentages is not permitted. It should be noted that all staff members have the ability to view the code in your signature, and if it's found to have a width% value, it will be disabled.

Click to expand...

Just wondering why this isn't allowed, as it's not very clear.

Given the context, it seems to be disabled because it prevents people from circumventing the 600px rule, but it also hinders our ability to style our signatures for use cases that do not fall under this brand.

I once had my signature tagged because I'd used a width: 100%; on an internal div to lay a color filter over my signature. I worked around it with a position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; but it felt really unnecessary.

I'm pretty sure browser compatibility doooes have something to do with that rule. Not all browser versions support CSS% tags...which, using the wrong kind of browser on PC will pretty much distort the current page where your signature was posted.

Maybe back when the rule was created it was so. But nowadays you won't see a page without percentages, and it's thoroughly supported in every major browser. As a web developer, I use percentages all the time. MDN tells us that there's been support since Chrome 1, Safari 1, Firefox 1, and IE 5. Maybe we could amend this rule?

Changed my signature's height.
I just want to make sure that it's within limits.

Avishka said:

Changed my signature's height.
I just want to make sure that it's within limits.

Click to expand...

Looks great, and is all good to go! :D

Is it okay now? :( I'm not getting rid of the picture. It's really special to me, and it means a lot to me. ><

You're gonna have to make it a little smaller. It's a bit too big as it is right now.

How? It seems perfectly fine on my end. ._.

It's making a scrollbar on my end....

I don't know what the code is on mine, someone just told me what to copy and paste to make it work, is it okay?

There. I took out whatever text I could. If I make the image any smaller, it will be hard to read it then. Seriously, this image means more to me than the look of my signature right now. :(

Is it fine now? ;o; PLEASE SAY IT'S OKAY. *ready to cry*

The Fangirl said:

There. I took out whatever text I could. If I make the image any smaller, it will be hard to read it then. Seriously, this image means more to me than the look of my signature right now. :(

Is it fine now? ;o; PLEASE SAY IT'S OKAY. *ready to cry*

Click to expand...

Nah, it seems fine now. =)

Is my signature fine and without a problem?

The Fangirl said:

There. I took out whatever text I could. If I make the image any smaller, it will be hard to read it then. Seriously, this image means more to me than the look of my signature right now. :(

Is it fine now? ;o; PLEASE SAY IT'S OKAY. *ready to cry*

Click to expand...

Zekrom said:

Nah, it seems fine now. =)

Click to expand...

It's 800 pixels wide, which is 200px above the maximum width limit, just so y'all know. :/

DynamicMan2 said:

Is my signature fine and without a problem?

Click to expand...

Yes, yours is fine! :D

Wait, so it's not okay then? D: *doesn't understand what you are saying*