- 10,673
- Posts
- 16
- Years
- Seen Sep 29, 2024
Yeahhhh, that logic doesn't make sense to me either. For example, someone might use an image of a celebrity. Say that celebrity has has been in erotic scenes in films that might be 18+, but not necessarily "porno". An example might be Halle Berry, who has been in movies marked for 18+ and has been in such scenes. Now, staff would never disable that avatar on the premise that the image of Halle Berry isn't pornographic, or in any indecent. So I do not believe that we would do the same for any anime character even if they were known for "hentai".I had a member say to me the other day that avatars from certain anime or shows are not allowed, even if they are not showing anything "offensive" or sexual in nature. Even if it's a character from x anime in a normal position or stance, it's not permitted simply because it derives from x.
Is this true?
And what if you don't know an anime girl, for example, is a character in hentei, ecchi or some sexist, violent and overly-sexualized series? I get a lot of my avatars from a random site. I haven't even watched most of 'em.
That said, pretty much every anime is either violent or sexual in some way. Where could the line be drawn, if ever? And would that make Breaking Bad inappropriate because the series is about violence, drugs, etc.?
And what about avatars that depict things that large populations might find offensive? How is that any different if those are allowed to be purposefully expressed, especially in contrast to anime avatars (where the origins are often dubious)?
Just curious :pink_nod:
Rule of thumb: if the avatar isn't offensive or break our rules, it's fine. We don't have a rule against using imagery of characters who have been in 18+/Rated R scenes or movies, but we do have one that disallows nudity/violent/indecent material. So long as it doesn't contain any of the latter you're totally fine.