• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Chit-Chat: the daily chit-chat (jan2019 - jun2019)

Status
Not open for further replies.
EvilChameleon said:
Also, if you have the chance, go to EPCOT this year before Summer hits and they begin to replace Illuminations with IP-driven shows.
Click to expand...

ROE is probably my least favourite nighttime show at WDW so I wont be too upset when it leaves. The interim show does look interesting at least.
 
Been to a disney place twice. Once was one in California back when I was a young kid, so I don't remember everything. Second time was maybe 5-6 years back with a bunch of friends in Disneyland Tokyo.
 
Last edited:
my mom was one of the landscape architects who worked on a Universal Studios resort so since I have a vested interest in the discussion I hope people won't mind when I correct them and explain to them that, objectively speaking, universal >>> disney = ^)
 
I was joking, I don't care which park people like more

but even then I'm not sure that scenery is as subjective as people make it out to be, Disney theme parks are generally recognised by design experts to be at or near the top, with universal studios being close. iirc some of disney's rides cost up to $200 million to make because of how design intensive they are. at any rate I know a lot of it is confidential because that's just how the industry works but design firms like Forrec are regularly hired for consulting roles on projects by universal studios/legoland/six flags/etc but not for Disney projects, they don't seem to trust a whole lot of people to manage their stuff; their quality of production is just impressive, probably better than universal studios, and not by an insignificant margin
 
Last edited:
noa said:
Who here is gay
Click to expand...

Applying sexuality terms to myself feels nauseating and off-mark. It's like what Pete Burns from Dead or Alive said:

"[People] always want to know – am I gay, bi, trans or what? I say, forget all that. There's got to be a completely different terminology and I'm not aware if it's been invented yet. I'm just Pete."
Click to expand...

I'm just me. That means an extensive appreciation for both sexes which is rarely consistent and sometimes approaches the asexual. Pigeonholing some people is a waste of time because they're like this globule of ectoplasm that keeps gaining new definitions.

But 'grats to the people who are secure in that respect. Like, they can call themselves something and it applies 100% per cent. I don't think I have that at all.

Does anyone else feel two-sided in every way?
 
I'm not gay, I'm European

Honestly I don't care for sexuality labels either...or even gender labels. Or any labels designed to strip me of my individuality and make me easier to understand for people who will never understand me. Just let me be me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top